■NHK, NTT, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Johnny's, and commercial broadcasters
I made two comments at the National Association of Commercial Broadcasters in Japan meeting.
1. NHK, NTT, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
The direction of discussions within the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications regarding NHK's internet services and subscription fees has become clearer.
I do have some points to make, such as the fact that the discussion is still stuck in a dichotomy between commercial broadcasters and NHK, and that there's not enough attention to global internet trends or data-driven approaches. However, the question of where to draw the line regarding deregulation of NHK is more of a political issue than a policy one.
Once this is finalized, broadcasting administration will be completed, and the government will have no further work to do for a while.
At that same time, the topic of abolishing the NTT Law came up. For broadcasters, this would mean NTT's investment in broadcasting would become more unrestricted. This, too, is more of a political issue than a policy issue, concerning where to draw the line regarding deregulation of NTT.
If this is resolved, then the government's telecommunications administration will be completed, and for a while, there will be no government work other than deciding what to do with Rakuten.
This reminds me of something that happened 25 years ago. At that time, the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, which had just finished the NTT reorganization that had been underway for 12 years since the privatization of NTT, and was eager to tackle the NHK problem next, was hit with the Hashimoto administrative reform plan to dismantle the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications. This time, too, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, which has just finished its major work, may be hit with a reorganization of government ministries.
2. The Broadcasting Industry and the Economy
Another issue currently gripping broadcasting is the Johnny's scandal. The agency is maintaining its structure without change, and the broadcasting industry has accepted this. At least, no stations have called for the termination of their business relationship. However, this has drawn objections from the industrial sector and economic organizations that act as sponsors, leaving the situation once again at a crossroads.
When I was in charge of the broadcasting industry at the government office, I thought the biggest problem was that the broadcasting industry (including advertising and entertainment) was isolated from the industrial sector and not integrated into the economic value chain.
Advertising spending is dependent on GDP, making it secure during periods of growth regardless of the state of the industry. However, even if the economy declines, it is unrelated to industrial policy and will not receive any assistance.
No one listened to my arguments. In fact, it seemed more like, "Perhaps it's better that way, that is, that broadcasting should be independent . "
Around that time, the internet emerged, and the industrial sector shifted its focus to it, but broadcasting rejected convergence and remained secure for a quarter of a century. Now, however, that situation is becoming precarious, and recently, broadcasters have been increasingly pushing towards the internet.
And now we have this case. Compliance standards in the industrial sector are becoming internationalized and are striving to be integrated into global chains. However, broadcasting is unaware of this and intends to get by with its old ways. In response to this, Mr. Niinami of the Japan Association of Corporate Executives and other members of the industrial sector have sounded the alarm about this disconnect.
How will the broadcasting industry perceive this? How will the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, which previously considered this someone else's problem, be affected by political pressure? These concerns remain.




