The creation of a
task force dedicated to the creation of a safe and secure internet for young
people is currently being debated by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications. I am a chirman.
9 years have passed since the formation of the industry-academic-government
platform “Japan Internet Safety Promotion Association” as a measure for
protecting young people on the internet.
During this period of outcry, Prime Minister Fukuda stated that, “Cellphones do a lot of harm and no good for young people.” Our group responded with a counter movement, stating that, “Cell phones do a lot of good and only some harm.”
During this period of outcry, Prime Minister Fukuda stated that, “Cellphones do a lot of harm and no good for young people.” Our group responded with a counter movement, stating that, “Cell phones do a lot of good and only some harm.”
This was followed
by a brief period of calm, only for the internet environment of young people to
face a sudden and complete change. Cellphones were replaced with smartphones,
content was replaced with social media, and the website were replaced with
apps. Soon after, new problems emerged.
Meanwhile, the government changed its stance from anti-technology
to pro-technology by laying down plans to enable children to study on tablets
by 2020. Our group was part of the movement that pushed for this. Yet, this
came with its own set of problems.
There was a briefing from the Ministry of Internal Affairs and
Communications at the beginning of the task force debate.
- 94% of high school students and 46% of middle school students
own smartphones.
- There is an upward trend of crime resulting from community
sites.
- Parental controls are used on 65% of cellphones and 45% of
smartphones.
- Many parents believe that they can control their child’s
activity on the internet even without the use of parental controls.
The task force’s agenda is:
1) Literacy education
2) Parental control countermeasures
3) Framework implementation
The plan was to perform a total inspection of past internet safety
measures and use the results to plan out specific actions.
Committee members offered many views regarding these issues.
1) Some of the views brought up concerning literacy include that
education is the most important countermeasure against literacy, that the
problem lies with parents and not the children, and that problems will be faced
when responding to those with low awareness. There were also strong opinions
inquiring about responsiveness in the classroom.
2) For parental controls, many brought up the complexity of
setting up the filters and called for reform to make them easier to understand.
Sales agents reported that, “It takes an entire 15 minutes just to explain how
parental controls work to a customer, making for a total of 2 hours.” It makes
perfect sense that some customers would rather not set them up than sit through
the explanation.
However, the reform of smartphone parental controls would require
the cooperation of OS businesses (e.g., Apple, Google). It is unlikely that they would respond to the
requests of a single country. This is the current problem that we face.
3) Provided that countermeasures for literacy and parental
controls are rolled out, we are left with the difficult question of what
framework the organization will move forward with. There is actually a very
high number of stakeholders involved in the protection of young people on the
internet.
Third-party organizations such as the Japan Internet Safety
Promotion Association. Providers such as communication carriers, manufacturers,
sales agents, social media, and OS businesses. Users such as parents and
schools. The government, the Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs
and Communications, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and
Technology, the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, the Consumer Affairs
Agency, and the National Police Agency. Finally, all of the municipalities.
They are all stakeholders.
The countermeasure can be considered both intangible/tangible and
while this is a global issue, it is a cost sector that will not produce profit
on its own. Though related to business, its public interest is high. Now, how
do we redesign it? Please lend us your knowledge and expertise. Thank you.
0 コメント:
コメントを投稿