“Who’s Your City?”
by Richard Florida. According to the author, in addition doing
“what” “with whom,” what is meaningful in life is “where” = place of residence.
Here are the five points that I found
convincing. à are my
thoughts.
1) The world is not becoming flat, but it is
rather becoming integrated. Production elements of creativity and innovation
are deviated and concentrated in specific regions. In advanced nations, 3/4 of
the population lives in urban areas. In the United States, Large urban areas are
responsible for more than 90% of the GDP.
à Urban
regeneration by integration is a free set of movement and exchange by the
development of transportation and communication. I live in the city myself, and
the style of securing free movement suits me.
2) The number one economic production mega
region is greater Tokyo area ($2.5 trillion) and the second is Boston/NY/DC
area ($2.2 trillion). The scale of these two regions is comparable to the
entire country of Germany. “Osaka (Kyoto) Nagoya” ($1.4 trillion) is in 5th place. The economic production of these “regions” surpass “countries” like Italy, Canada, India, South Korea, and Russia.
à The large
size of Tokyo area is Japan’s strength. Regional activation policy is
in the spotlight once again, but if this is bundled with the weakening of Tokyo
area, I think they should rethink it. How can we strengthen Tokyo area and
Osaka area? This is more of the modern theme.
3) When measuring innovation based on the
number of patents, Tokyo, NY, and SF stand out. Boston, Paris, and Osaka
follow.
à I have
lived in Tokyo, Boston, Paris, and Osaka (Kyoto), so I am probably insensitive
to the pros of living in other regions. I want to hear the opinions on this
book from the people who are involved in the regional activation effort.
4) There are four mega regions of greater
Sapporo, greater Tokyo, Osaka/Nagoya, and Northern Kyushu, but the borders are
unclear. Japan may be taking the steps to becoming the world’s first integrated super mega region = a giant single economic area.
à This book
suggests the strengthening and connecting of these four large urban areas by
activating small-scale regional cities. I want to hear the opinions of people
who are involved in regional activation policy on this as well.
5) There is a great correlation between the
population concentration of bohemian (artists) and gay people, and housing
price. Sense of beauty, tolerance, and cultural openness that such population
has for the environment may be contributing to it.
à Integration
of bohemia is also a part of Cool Japan policy. It is the inbound policy of
creators. However, favorable treatment policy for gay people has never been
discussed before. Who should propose this?
0 コメント:
コメントを投稿