■Literacy policy has finally gone from negative to positive.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications' ICT Literacy Study Group has started. Professor Tatsuhiko Yamamoto of Keio University is the chair, and I am the deputy chair. This is probably the first time that I will be serving as a committee member with Nanako Ishido.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications has been focusing on safety and security measures for young people, in other words, risk avoidance, and has not done much to promote their use. Measures for adult use have also been weak. It is finally time for a positive change.
I commented.
he left the government office and founded the NPO CANVAS, which promotes the One PC for Every Child initiative at MIT and helps children develop their digital expression and creativity.
However, Japan was slow to respond, and instead, a trend of keeping digital devices away from children spread. I was the organizer and established the Anshin Kyokai (Safety Association). Filtering and other safety measures have progressed.
At the same time, the Digital Textbook Teaching Materials Council (DiTT) was launched, and the three-part set of one PC per student, school internet access, and digital textbooks was promoted. A positive movement.
It was hard. It took eight years to pass a law allowing digital textbooks, and programming became compulsory. One PC per student was realized through GIGA. If it weren't for COVID, it would have taken another 25 years.
We had originally thought that safety and security measures and the promotion of digital use should be pursued together, but due to a lack of power, it was difficult to integrate them.
Now that all children are in an environment where they can study digitally, I feel that the momentum has finally changed and we have finally reached this point of holding a meeting like this.
The problem is what happens next.
Digital education in schools is progressing. Although confusion and problems will arise, I want to trust in the capabilities of those in the field and the children, and keep a watchful eye on them.
The focus of policy will shift to the home, especially inequality and the issue of whether or not people can use digital devices at home.
From 40,000 schools to 10 million families with children. From education issues to communication issues. The work of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications rather than the Ministry of Education. The most important issue in communication policy.
Literacy in terms of protecting against security and fake information is important, but what's even more important is developing creativity and communication skills.
Even adults don't have this skill. There are some areas where children are better than them.
Two years ago, I opened an ICT university and have been teaching it to students. Children and adults use it together and learn.
Tools change. SNS, mixi , fb, LINE, etc. are constantly changing, so there is no set teaching method.
Even after 150 years, analog education using paper and pencil has not yet provided the ideal education.
Digital learning is in its infancy, and even after 100 years we are still far from our ideal.
It would be good to have the attitude of using it and taking the time to think about it together.
The policy objective is to increase the "user power of the people."
If so, digital
1. Helpful,
2. Fun,
3. Safety,
I think the ranking should be as follows, but the countermeasures taken so far have been biased towards 3.
how to 1. increase convenience and 2. increase enjoyment were missing.
I would like to strengthen measures to enhance creativity and empathy.